Community engagement: Barriers and drivers in South African higher education

B.J. Johnson

Abstract


Community engagement professionals experience numerous barriers even though community engagement is the third mission of the university alongside first, teaching and learning, and second, research. Community engagement professionals often refer to community engagement as the “stepchild” of higher education. Yet there are also inter-related successful drivers. This article identifies the barrier–driver duality and makes a case for their systemic interconnectedness, an area that has thus far been underexplored. A prominent barrier for community engagement professionals is that there is a lack of substantive conceptualisation of community engagement, intensified by the contradictory placing of community engagement within community and university structures. Interconnected to such barriers, prominent drivers demonstrate the value of scholarly, reflective practice and to enhance the leadership role of the South African Higher Education Community Engagement Forum, inclusive of the views of pertinent members such as academic leaders, students and communities.


Keywords


community engagement, integrating barriers and drivers, community engagement practitioners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altbach, Philip. G. 2015. Massification and the global knowledge economy: The continuing contradiction. In Education, I. H. IHE at Twenty Two Decades of News and Analysis, 4‒4. http://ejournals.bc.edu/ ojs/index.php/ihe/article/view/6126/5365

ASHE Higher Education Report. 2014. Community as place. The concept of community: Readings with interpretations: 47–48. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct= true&db=eue&AN=95779690&site=eds-live&scope=site.

Badat, Saleem. 2013. Eleven theses on CE at universities, the social responsibility of universities: Community and civic engagement – context and big picture. The 4th International Exhibition and Conference on Higher Education (4-IECHE), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 16‒19 April 2013.

Baxter, Pamela and Susan Jack. 2008 Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report 13(4): 544–559.

Bender, Gerda. 2008. Exploring conceptual models for community engagement at higher education institutions in South Africa: Conversation. Perspectives in Education 26(1): 81–95.

Bellig, Shelley, Barbara E. Moely and Barbara A. Holland. 2009. Research informing practice: Developing practice standards and guidelines for improving service learning and community engagement. In Creating our identities in service-learning and community engagement. Partnerships: A Journal of Service-Learning and Civic Engagement (Vol. 0), ed. Barbara A. Holland, Shelley Bellig and Barbara E. Moely. https://doi.org/ 10.7253/partj.v0i0.435

Bhagwan, P. R. 2017. Towards a conceptual understanding of community engagement in higher education in South Africa. Perspectives in Education 35(1): 171–186. https://doi.org/ 10.18820/2519593x/pie.v35i1.13

Bocken, Nancy M. P. and Thijs H. J. Geradts. 2019. Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning. (in press). 101950. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101950

Bowen, Glenn A. 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9(2): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brown-Luthango, Mercy. 2013. Community-university engagement: The Philippi CityLab in Cape Town and the challenge of collaboration across boundaries. Higher Education 65(3): 309–24. www.jstor.org/ stable/23351699

Cherrington, Avivit M., Eileen Scheckle, Mathabo Khau, Naydene de Lange and A. du Plessis. 2019. What does it mean to be an “engaged university”? Reflections from a university and school-community engagement project. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 14(2): 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1177% 2F1746197918779945

Cooper, David. 2009. University-civil society (U-CS) research relationships: The importance of a “fourth helix” alongside the “triple helix” of university-industry-government (UIG) relations. South African Review of Sociology 40(2): 153–180 https://doi.org/10.1080/ 21528586.2009.10425106

Council on Higher Education. 2016. South African higher education reviewed: Two decades of democracy. Pretoria, South Africa: Council on Higher Education.

De Lange, George. 2012. Developing a university-community engagement conceptual framework and typology – A case study of a South African comprehensive university. Africa Insight 42(2): 94‒111. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC129883

Department of Higher Education. 1997. White Paper 3: A programme for the Transformation of Higher Education. Government Gazette No 1820, 15 August. Pretoria: Government Printers

Ebersöhn, Liesel, Tilda Loots, Irma Eloff and Ronél Ferreira. 2015. Taking note of obstacles research partners negotiate in long-term higher education community engagement partnerships. Teaching and Teacher Education 45: 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tate.2014.09.003

Erasmus, Mabel. 2007. Supporting academic staff as champions of service learning. Education and Change 11(3), Special Issue: CSL. http://doi: 10.1080/16823200709487183

Englander, Magnus. 2019. General knowledge claims in qualitative research. Humanistic Psychologist 47(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000107

Etzkowitz, Henry. 2003. Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social science information 42(3): 293‒337.

Favish, Judy and Sonwabo Ngcelwane. 2013. Survey of community engagement practices at universities. (Unpublished background survey for task team).

Goddard, John. 2007. The engagement of higher education institutions in regional development: An overview of the opportunities and challenges. Paper presented at the OECD/IMHE International Conference 19–21 September 2007, Valencia, Spain.

Goddard, John. 2018. The civic university and the city. In Geographies of the University, 355‒373. Springer, Cham

Goddard, John, Ellen Hazelkorn and Paul Vallance. (Eds.). 2016. The civic university: The policy and leadership challenges. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Goddard, John and Paul Vallance. 2011. The civic university and the leadership of place. Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS). Newcastle UK: Newcastle University.

Habib, Adam. 2019. Our job is to reflect the plurality of the society. Presentation at University of South Africa Forum (USAF) Conference: Re-inventing South Africa’s Universities of the Future. In Daily Higher Education News on-line (DHEN), 19 November 2019. https://www.newssite.co.za/usaf/university-society.html

HEQC, CHESP see Higher Education Quality Committee/Community Higher Education Service Partnerships.

Higher Education Quality Committee/Community Higher Education Service Partnerships. 2006. Community engagement in higher education. Pretoria. Council on Higher Education.

Huy, Quy N. 2001. In praise of middle managers. Harvard Business Review 79(8): 72–79.

Kearney, Judith. 2015. Challenges for community engagement: An Australian perspective. Educational Research for Social Change 4(1): 26–39.

Lazarus, Josef, Mabel Erasmus, Denver Hendricks, Joyce Nduna and Jerome Slamat. 2008. Embedding community engagement in South African higher education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 3(1): 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197907086719

Mantere, Suku. 2005. Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity. Strategic Organization 3(2): 157–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127005052208

MacGregor, Karen. 27 April 2014. Higher Education in the 20th year of democracy. In University World News. www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story= 20140425131554856

Nature 467. 2010. Editorials: 883–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/467883b

Nowell, Lorelli S., Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White and Nancy J. Moules. 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 1609406917733847.

Rabin, Lisa 2014. Service-learning/Aprendizaje-servicio as a global practice in Spanish. The Routledge handbook of Hispanic applied linguistics, 168‒183. Oxon and New York. Routledge.

Saldaña, Johnny. 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 3rd Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Sandmann, Lorilee R. 2008. Conceptualization of the scholarship of engagement in higher education: A strategic review, 1996–2006. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement: 91–104.

Schwandt, Thomas A. 2003. Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In The landscape of qualitative research, ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 292–331. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Scott, David and Marlene Morrison. 2006. Key ideas in educational research. A&C Black. London and New York. The Continuum International Publishing Group.

Slamat, Jerome. 2013. Inside View IV.2.1 Community-university engagement in South Africa, Higher Education in the World 5: The Global University Network for Innovation, 152‒156. http://www.guninetwork.org/ files/inside_view_iv.2.1_1.pdf

Tapia, Maria Nieves. 2014. PowerPoint presentation: “University Engagement and academic excellence: A view from the Global South”, 11–13 June 2014. Round table discussion Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.

Weerts, David J. and Lorilee R. Sandmann. 2008. Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education 32(1): 73‒106.

Wood, Lesley and Ortrun Zuber-Skerrit. 2013. PALAR as a methodology for community engagement by faculties of education. South African Journal of Education 33(4): 1–15. https://doi: 10.15700/201412171322




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/34-6-4116

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.