What educator capabilities are necessary for reflective learning in accounting students?
One of the main roles of universities is to facilitate quality teaching and learning in accordance with applicable professional and academic standards. Academic departments are required to ensure that qualifying teaching staff possess the necessary experience to offer these qualifications. Accounting lecturers in South African universities are employed based mainly on their Accounting qualifications. However, in order to secure tenure in Accounting academia, the prospective lecturer has to satisfy employment criteria for teaching and learning, research and community engagement. An educator’s approach to teaching determines whether he/she is teacher-centred or student-centred. This article seeks to determine the relationship between educator capabilities and student performance. In discussing this relationship, it is clear that work/industry experience, teaching qualification and teaching experience are intended to satisfy the aspect of teaching and learning which, in turn, is expected to improve student performance. System Dynamics is used as an analytical model to determine the relationship between lecturer capabilities and student performance. The model is used on the three areas of educator capabilities, namely, work experience, teaching qualification and teaching experience as criteria for improving student performance in Accounting education. In the final analysis, this article argues that lecturers who possess these critical qualities tend to be student-centred, which is necessary for reflective learning in students.
Akerlind, G. S. 2003. Growing and developing as a university teacher-variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education 28(4): 375‒390. doi: 10.1080/0307507032000122242.
Barlow, J. and M. Antoniou. 2007. Room for improvement: The experiences of new lecturers in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44(1): 67‒77.
Betts, F. 1992. How systems thinking applies to education. Educational Leadership 50(3): 38‒41.
Biggs, J. 1999. What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education: Research and Development 18(1): 57‒75.
Caldwell, S. B. and T. D. Gedeon. 2016. Boldly going where no higher educators have gone before: A review of the 1st International Conference on Higher Education Advances, Valencia, Spain. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences 228: 348‒355.
Carnell, E. 2007. Conceptions of effective teaching in higher education: Extending the boundaries. Teaching in Higher Education 12(1): 25‒40.
Clinebell, S. K. and J. M. Clinebell. 2008. The tension in business education between academic rigor and real-world relevance: The role of executive professors. Academy of Management Learning & Education 7(1): 99‒107.
De Jong, R., J. Mulder, P. Deneer and H. Van Keulen. 2013. Poldering a teaching qualification system in higher education in the Netherlands: A typical Dutch phenomenon. Revista de Docencia Universitaria 11(3): 23‒40.
Duta, N. and E. Rafaila. 2014. Training the competences in higher education ‒ a comparative study on the development of relational competencies of university teachers. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences 128: 522‒526.
Duta, N. V. and R. Folostina. 2014. Continuous training of university teachers ‒ theoretical approaches and practical implications. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioural Sciences 116: 3449‒3453.
Grottke, M., C. Pelger and C. Schmiedeberg. 2013. Firm or faculty? Evidence on characteristics of German-speaking accounting PhD students and their career preferences. Accounting Education 22(1): 66‒84.
Hirsch, G. B., R. Levine and R. L. Miller. 2007. Using system dynamics modeling to understand the impact of social change initiatives. American Journal of Community Psychology 39(3‒4): 239‒253. doi: 10.7007/s10464-007-9114-3.
Hunde, A. B. and G. Tacconi. 2014. Teacher educators’ practices from the view of building lifelong learning capabilities in student teachers. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences 136: 496‒500.
Jackson, M. C. 2003. Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley.
Kamaruddin, W. N. W. and M. S. Ibrahim. 2010. Enhancing Malaysian Polytechnic technical lecturers’ competency through the identification of professional development programs. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioural Sciences 7(C): 446‒454.
Kember, D. 1997. A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction 7(3): 255‒275.
Kember, D. 2009. Promoting student-centred forms of learning across an entire university. Higher Education 58: 1‒13.
Kember, D. and K. Kwan. 2000. Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science 28: 469‒490.
Lewin, T. and M. Mawoyo. 2014. Student access and success: Issues and interventions in South African universities. Cape Town: Inyathelo: The SA Institute for Advancement.
Long, C. S., Z. Ibrahim and T. O. Kowang. 2014. An analysis on the relationship between lecturers’ competencies and student’ satisfaction. International Education Studies 7(1): 37‒46. doi: 10.5539/ies.v7n1p37.
Lubbe, I. 2014. Educating professionals: Describing the knowledge agency of accounting academics. Meditari Accountancy Research 22(1): 107‒127.
Marques, J. C. 2013. Pedagogic qualification of higher education teaching staff ‒ the third wave. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy 3(4): 47‒49.
Martin, E., M. Prosser, K. Trigwell, P. Ramsden and J. Benjamin. 2000. What university teachers teach and how they teach it. Instructional Science 28: 387‒412.
McAlpine, L., C. Amundsen, M. Clement and G. Light. 2009. Rethinking our underlying assumptions about what we do and why we do it: Academic development as a case. Studies in Continuing Education 31(3): 261‒280. doi: 10.1080/01580370903271461.
Miranda, G. J., S. P. De Castro Casa Nova and E. B. Cornacchione. 2013. To Sir with love: The relations between teacher qualification and student performance in accounting. Review of Business Management 15(48): 462‒480.
Mounce, P. H., D. S. Mauldin and R. L. Braun. 2004. The importance of relevant practical experience among accounting faculty: An empirical analysis of students’ perceptions. Issues in Accounting Education 19(4): 399‒411.
Ng, S. F., N. S. I. C. Hassan, N. H. M. Nor and N. A. A. Malek. 2017. The relationship between smartphone use and academic performance: A case of students in a Malaysian tertiary institution. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology 5(4): 58‒70.
Nicholls, G. 2005. New lecturers’ constructions of learning, teaching and research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 30(5): 611‒625.
Nieuwoudt, M. J. and J. S. Wilcocks. 2005. The attitudes and perceptions of South African accounting academics about research. Meditari Accountancy Research 13(2): 49‒66.
Parker, L. D., J. Guthrie and S. Linacre. 2011. The relationship between academic accounting research and professional practice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 24(1): 5‒14.
Postareff, L., S. Lindblom-Ylanne and A. Nevgi. 2008. A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Higher Education 56: 29‒43.
Prosser, M. and K. Trigwell. 1997. Using phenomenography in the design of programs for teachers in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development 16(1): 41‒54.
Ramsden, P., M. Prosser, K. Trigwell and E. Martin. 2007. University teachers’ experiences of academic leadership and their approaches to teaching. Learning and Instruction 17: 140‒155.
Remmik, M. and M. Karm. 2012. Novice university teachers’ professional learning: To follow traditions or change them? Studies for the Learning Society 2(3): 121‒131.
Reynolds, M. and S. Holwell. 2010. Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide.: Springer London
Samkin, G. and A. Schneider. 2014. The accounting academic. Meditari Accountancy Research 22(1): 2‒19.
Savaya, R. and F. Gardner. 2012. Critical reflection to identify gaps between espoused theory and theory-in-use. Social Work 57(2): 145‒154.
Simona, G. 2015. Teacher training for embedding life skills into vocational teaching Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences 180: 814‒819.
Tang, T. L. 1997. Teaching evaluation at a public institution of higher education: Factors related to the overall teaching effectiveness. Public Personnel Management 26(3): 379‒389.
Tigelaar, D. E. H., D. H. J. M. Dolmans, I. H. A. P. Wolfhagen and C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten. 2004. The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education. Higher Education 48: 253‒268.
Trigwell, K. 2001. Judging university teaching. International Journal for Academic Development 6(1): 65‒73. doi: 10.1080/13601440110033698.
Trigwell, K. 2012. Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches to teaching in higher education. Instructional Science 40: 607‒621.
Trigwell, K., M. Prosser and F. Waterhouse. 1999. Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education 37: 57‒70.
Trigwell, K., K. C. Rodriguez and F. Han. 2012. Assessing the impact of a university teaching development programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37(4): 499‒511.
Van der Merwe, N., S. McChlery and S. S. Visser. 2014. Balancing academic and professional pedagogies: A comparative study of two accounting departments in South Africa and the UK. Teaching in Higher Education 19(3): 276‒288.
Van der Schyf, D. B. 2008. Five recent developments’ impact on the traditional academic culture of Departments of Accounting at South African universities. Meditari Accountancy Research 16(2): 1‒12.
Venter, E. R. and C. De Villiers. 2013. The accounting profession’s influence on academe: South African evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 26(8): 1246‒1278.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authorsÂ and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.Â
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0