Online assessment in Moodle: A framework for supporting our students
With the increased intake of students at many higher education institutions, the teaching, learning and assessment of large groups is one of the biggest challenges facing educators. Appropriate online assessment may address some of the challenges faced in the teaching and learning setting. In this paper, the experiences of 392 mathematics students, undertaking their assessments via Moodle at a University in the Eastern Cape of South Africa, are described. Student experiences informed the design of a supportive-environmental framework for online assessment.
The theoretical lens for this research study is framed by mastery learning, student experience and online assessment. The research reported on in this paper highlights one aspect of the project: the third phase of the action-research cycle, namely, to observe the implementation of online assessment.
Examples from two blended-learning Moodle courses highlight some of the experienced difficulties and successes. The lessons learnt informed the online-assessment design and implementation to introduce supportive environments for online assessment. The knowledge gained from this study culminated in a 4-Pillar Supportive-Online Assessment Framework for Blended-Learning environments, which could contribute to an improvement in online-assessment practices.
Abedi, R. 2014. International Association for Educational Assessment. Singapore 40th Annual Conference. http://www.iaea.info/documents/paper_371f3ab4.pdf (accessed on 11 September 2016).
Allen, E. and J. Seaman. 2014. Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group Report. http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/grade-change-2013 (accessed on 9 September 2016).
Anderson, L.W. 1975. Major Assumptions of Mastery Learning. Annual Meeting of the Southeast Psychological Association . ERIC Online. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED150172.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2016).
Anderson, T. 2004. Teaching in an Online Learning Context. Athabasca University. http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/ch11.html (accessed on 19 April 2016).
Bloom, B.S. 1968. "Learning for Mastery" UCLA - CSEIP - Evaluation Comment.
Cowan, J. 2005. Designing assessment to enhance student learning. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/ps/documents/practice_guides/practice_guides/ps0069_designing_assessment_to_improve_physical_sciences_learning_march_2009.pdf (accessed 2010) and http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/docs/workshop/designing-assessment-to-enhance-student-learning-paper.pdf (accessed on 15 Aug 2017).
Davis, D. and J. Sorrell. 1995. Mastery learning in public schools. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/files/mastlear.html (accessed on 11 September 2016).
Engelbrecht, M. 2005. Adapting to changing expectations: Postgraduate students’ experience of an e-learning tax program. Computers & Education, 45, 217–229.
Groen, L., M. Coupland, T. Langtry, J. Memar, B. Moore and J. Stanley. 2015. The mathematics problem and mastery-learning for first-year, undergraduate STEM students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 11(1), 141–160.
Guskey, T.R. 2008. Chapter 21: Mastery Learning in 21st century education: A reference handbook. Vol. 1, Ed. by T L Good. Sage Thousand Oaks, CA: Publication.
Holtz, F. 2006. Enhancing Supportive-Learning Environments and Student Achievement through Project ALERT. http://daretodifferentiate.wikispaces.com/file/view/319_EnhancingSLE_and_SA.pdf (accessed on 7 August 2016).
Inui, T.S. 2015. The Charismatic Journey of Mastery Learning. Academic Medicine. Vol 90 (11: 1427-1575.
Kauffmann, H. 2015. A Review of Predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology Vol 23.
Kerr, M.S., K. Rynearson and M.C. Kerr. 2006. Student characteristics for online-learning success. Internet and Higher Education 9: 91-105. doi:10.1016j.iheduc.2006.03.002.
Kim, K.J., S. Liu and C.J. Bonk. 2005. Online MBA students’ perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 335-344. ELSEVIER 8: doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.09.005.
Kulik, C.L., J.A. Kulik and J. Bangert-Drowns. 1990. Effectiveness of mastery-learning programs: A meta-analysis". Review of Educational Research 60(1): 265–299. doi:10.3102/00346543060002265.
Leidner, D.E. and S.L. Jarvenpaa. 1995. The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical Review. MIS Quaterly 19 (3): 265-291. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249596.
Liaw, S.S., H.M. Huang and G.D. Chen. 2007. Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49, 1066–1080.
Machado, M. and E. Tao. 2007. Blackboard vs moodle: Comparing user experience of learning management systems. Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports. S4J-7-S4J-12.
Manchester, H., S. Ralph and O. Shipova. 2005. The teacher’s role in using WebCT as a communication tool with postgraduate students. The International Journal of Learning 12(4), 101−107.
McGaghie, W.C. 2015. Mastery Learning: It is Time for Medical Education to Join the 21st Century. Academic Medicine 90 (11): 1438-1441. doi:10.1097/ACM.000000000000911.
Norberg, A., C. Dzuiban and P. D. Moskal, 2011. A time-based blended-learning model. On the Horizon 19(3), 207-216.
Padayachee, P. H.Boshoff, W.Olivier, and A.Harding, 2011. A blended learning Grade 12 intervention using DVD technology to enhance the teaching and learning of mathematics. Pythagoras, 32(1), Art. #24, 8 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ pythagoras.v32i1.24 http://www.pythagoras.org.za/index.php/pythagoras/rt/printerFriendly/24/44
Padayachee, P. 2010. A Case Study: Exploring a DVD-driven approach for teaching and learning mathematics, at secondary school level, with a framework of blended learning. Unpublished PhD thesis. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University
Padayachee, P., H. Boshoff, A. Harding and H. Johannes. 2014. Elements of a supportive-learning environment for mathematics learners. International Research in Education 2 (2): 33-49.
Reason, P. and H. Bradbury. 2007. The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Sage Pubns Ltd.
Rossouw, D. 2009. Educators as action researchers: some key considerations. South African Journal of Education. EASA Vol 29:1-16.
SAQA. 2014. South African Qualifications Authority Standard Glossary of Terms. SAQA, April 2014. http://hr.saqa.co.za/glossary/pdf/5WBCVgxsLsdKRmta/Glossary%20of%20terms%20(April%202014).pdf (accessed on 5 April 2016).
Song, L., E.S. Singleton, J.H. Hill and M.H. Koh. 2004. Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education ELSEVIER 7: 59-70. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003.
Sorensen, E. 2013. Implementation and student perceptions of e-assessment in a Chemical Engineering module. European Journal of Engineering Education 38:2, 172-185. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03043797.2012.760533#.VxS3cvl97IU (accessed 18 April 2016) .
Sun, P.C., R.J. Tsai, G. Finger, Y.Y. Chen and D. Yeh. 2008. What Drives a Successful E-Learning? An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
Standard Glossary of Terms. SAQA, April 2014. http://hr.saqa.co.za/glossary/pdf/5WBCVgxsLsdKRmta/Glossary%20of%20terms%20(April%202014).pdf (accessed on 5 April 2016).
The Framework for 21st Century Learning. n.d.: http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework (accessed on 11 September 2016).
Tilghman, S.B. 2011. Designing and developing online-course assessments. Review of Higher Education and Self-learning 4 (9): 31-34.
Volery, T. and D. Lord. 2000. Critical Success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5),
Copyright (c) 2018 Pragashni Padayachee, Shirley Wagner-Welsh, Hermien Johannes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authorsÂ and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.Â
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0