Using action research for curriculum development and improving the learning experience: A case study

A. Oksiutycz, C. Azionya

Abstract


ABSTRACT

The need to bridge the gap between theory and praxis has necessitated the inclusion of context-based knowledge in university education that reflects the complexity of real life and grapples meaningfully with real world challenges. This has led to the inclusion of authentic learning practices in curricula and  an appliaction of new teaching methods to achieve high quality learning, characterised by relevance to students and their future work environments. This paper discusses the action research which became a fundation for developing an applied module for a new Strategic Communication degree at a South African university. The objective of the project was to ensure that the course provides relevant skills and competencies, creates opportunities for the application of disciplinary knowledge within a social context and enhances the student’s learning experience by using project-based teaching. This reflective process culminated in the development of a curriculum for the applied second year modules in the BA Strategic Communication degree.


Keywords


authentic learning; projects-based teaching; deep learning; interdisciplinary communities; action research; strategic communication; marketing communication; disciplinary convergence

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Ardley, B. 2006. Situated learning and marketing: Moving beyond the rational technical thought cage. Marketing Intelligence and Planning 24 (3): 202– 17.

Bader, L. and V. Zotter. 2012. Interdisciplinary: wishful thinking? Experiences at the University of Gratz". Multicultural Education and Technology Journal 6 (3): 118–136.

Brydon-Miller, M., D. Greenwood and P. Maguire. 2003. Why action research? Action Research 1(1): 9‒28.

Christensen, L.T., M. Morsing and G. Cheney. 2008. Corporate communications, convention, complexity and critique. London: Sage.

Clarke, P., D. Gray and A. Mearman. 2006. The marketing curriculum and educational aims: towards a professional education? Marketing Intelligence and Planning 24(3): 189–201.

Cornelissen, J. 2011. Corporate Communication: a guide to theory and practice. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.

Costello, P. J. M. 2003. Action research. London: Continuum.

Duncan, T. and S. Moriarty 1998. Communication-based marketing model for managing relationship, Journal of Marketing 62 (2): 1‒13.

Glatthorn, A. A. 1999. Performance standards and authentic learning. NY: Eye on Education.

Hallahan, K.2007. Integrated communication: implications for public relations beyond excellence. In The future of excellence in public relations and communication management, ed. E. L. Tooth, 299‒338. New York: Rutledge.

Herington, J. and R. Oliver. 2000) An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 48 (3): 23‒48.

Hutton, J. G. 2010. Defining the relationships between public relations and marketing: public relations most important challenge. In The Sage handbook of public relations, ed. R. L. Heath, 501‒522. London: Sage.

Kember, D.2005. Action learning and action research. London: Kogan Page.

Kozubska, J. and B. MacKenzie. 2012. Differences and impacts through action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice 9 (2): 145‒164.

Little, M. E. 2012. Action research and response to intervention: bridging the discourse divide. The Educational Forum 76 (1): 69‒80.

Lombardi, M. M. 2007. Authentic learning for the 21st century: an overview. An Overview. Educause Learning Initiative. Available from: https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli3009.pdf

Luar, D. 2013. Authentic learning experiences: a real world approach to project based learning. NY, USA: Rutledge.

McKenzie, A, D., C. K. Morgan, K. W. Cochrane, G. K. Watson and W. R. A. David. 2002. Authentic Learning: What is it and what are the ideal curriculum conditions to cultivate it. In Higher Education Research and Development, 426‒433.

Meyers, N. M. and D. D. Nulty. 2008. How to use (five) curriculum design principles to align authentic learning environments, assessments, students’ approaches to thinking and learning outcomes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (5): ‒65-577. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930802226502

Powell, P. 2007. Arguments for implementing projects based learning. The Journal of Independent Teaching and Learning 2: 13‒21.

Renzuli, J.S., M. Gentry and S. M. Reis. 2004. A time and a place for authentic learning. Educational Leadership 62 (1): 73‒77.

Rule, A. 2006. Editorial: the components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic Learning 3 (1): 1‒10.

Scott, D. M. 2009. The new rules of marketing and PR. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Saunders, M., P. Lewis and A Thornhill. 2003. Research methods for business students. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.

Stein, S., J. Isaacs and T. Andrews. 2004. Incorporating authentic learning experiences within a university course. Studies in Higher Education 29 (2): 239‒258.

Stringfellow, L., S. Ennis, R. Brennan and M. J. Harke. 2006. Mind the gap: The relevance of marketing education to marketing practice. Marketing Intelligence and Planning 24 (3): 245–256.

Waker, R .H., D. Hanson, L. Nelson and C. Fisher. 1998. A case for integrative multi-disciplinary marketing education. European Journal of Marketing 32 (9/10): 803‒812.

Warburton, K. 2003. Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 4 (1): 44‒56.

Wenger, E. and Wegner-Trayner, B. 2015. Introduction to communities of practice. http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/31-3-1062

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


eISSN: 1753-5913

Copyright © 2016 South African Journal of Higher Education

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2016.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Disclaimer:
This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.