Five-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention using second generation drug-eluting stents for multivessel coronary artery revascularisation
Abstract
Aim: This report evaluated outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DESs) compared to coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) for multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods: Sixty patients (43M, 17F); mean = 64.35 years (SD ± 10.4) who underwent PCI or CABG were followed up for 5 years. Revascularisation included 19 elective and 5 emergency cases. The composite outcome (defined as major adverse cardiac and cerebral events [MACCE]), and rates of repeat revascularisation were compared in each group using survival curves and adjusted Cox pro-portional hazard models.
Results: Nine (15%) patients sustained acute MI and 6 (10%) suffered a stroke during follow-up (PCI n=5, CABG n=4). There were 10 deaths (DVD n=2, TVD n=8) (6 CABG, 4 PCI). There was no difference in treatment effects between the 2 groups for time to MI, stroke, and angina (PCI 40% vs. CABG 23.3%, p=0.194). Adjusted 5-year risk of death (11.7% vs. 17.6%, OR=1.300, CI=0.313 - 5.404, p=1.000) and the composite of death, stroke and MI (51.3% vs. 44% p=0.566) were similar in the 2 groups. There was a higher rate of repeat revascularisation in PCI group (52.8% vs. 29.3%) (p=0.121.)
Conclusions: PCI using DESs for patients with multivessel CAD showed similar outcomes to CABG.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2025 SA Heart Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.Â
A copy of the authors’ publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.Â
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: “This is an electronic version of an article published in SAHJ, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX–XXX”, DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAHJ) may be found.Â
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University’s’ Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
Copyright Holder: SA Heart Journal
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0