Comparison of Three Different Fertigation Strategies for Drip Irrigated Table Grapes – Part III. Growth, Yield and Quality
Abstract
A field trial was carried out in a drip irrigated Dan-ben-Hannah/Ramsey vineyard near Paarl in the BergRiver Valley region of South Africa to compare three fertigation strategies. Fertilisers were applied (i)
two weeks after bud break, fruit set and post-harvest (LF), (ii) weekly from two weeks after bud break
until ten weeks after harvest, except during berry ripening (WF), and (iii) in daily irrigation pulses (DF).
Grapevines of all treatments received c. 116 kg/ha N, 22 kg/ha P and 92 kg/ha K per season. Grapevines
of all the fertigation strategies were thinned to obtain a normal and high crop load, which is 26 and
36 bunches per grapevine respectively for Dan-ben-Hannah. Crop load did not affect vegetative growth,
berry size or bunch mass. However, compared to LF and WF, DF increased the berry size of grapevines
bearing 26 bunches. Crop load tended to reduce juice TSS, irrespective of fertigation strategy, particularly
in 2002/03. Neither fertigation strategy nor crop load affected TTA and pH. Less berry crack contributed
to a higher yield and higher export percentage of the DF grapes. In addition, bigger berries, and therefore
better appearance, also contributed to the higher export quality of the DF grapes. Although the DF
grapevines bearing 36 bunches produced grapes of poorer colour and overall impression, they were within
export norms. Based on the foregoing, the DF strategy should not be regarded as the ultimate solution for
table grape production. However, it can be recommended for vineyards on poor soils or where berry crack
occurs commonly.
Downloads
A copyright form will be e-mailed to the corresponding author when the manuscript has been accepted for publication.
In principle, the Author agrees to the following when he/she signes the copyright agreement:
I hereby assign to the SOUTH AFRICAN SOCIETY FOR ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE (SASEV) the copyright of the text, tables, figures, supplementary material, illustrations and other information (the Material) submitted with the manuscript to be published in SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE (SAJEV) (the "Article"). The copyright becomes effective from the date the Article has been accepted for publication in SAJEV.
This is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Author's may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal webpage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJEV, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX - XXX, DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (www.journals.ac.za/index.php/sajev/) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University's Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0