A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing?: Theoretical Diversity and the Drive Toward Sameness

Abstract

The numerous efforts at restructuring legislative policy, and the implication of these efforts, have placed the South African psychological profession at a divergent juncture. In so far as can be ascertained, current and anticipated political changes have resulted in many professions being forced to question whether they have something to offer post-apartheid South Africa. Most pressing is whether certain services are useful and, if need be, how their application may be enhanced. Psychology has not remained outside of this process of introspection. In fact, many would argue that psychology has for too long remained stuck in a position of contemplative inquiry that has not sufficiently translated into action or real change. Perhaps a different sort of contemplation is now required. The present situation may provide this opportunity, yet it may also result in the possible degeneration of psychology. As such it represents a double-edged sword.

Specifically, this re-evaluation offers the profession a chance for growth in that psychological service can assume a higher profile in the mental health arena. This may translate into the creation of state-funded post and wider job opportunities. In order to realise this, psychology is urged to define itself and in doing so is required to justify its existence. In and of itself this is not an unreasonable request. After all psychology, like all service endeavours, need to be seen as worthwhile if it is to receive state funding and the sanction necessary for propagating the discipline. Therefore, this process of definition is crucial if psychology is to survive into a post-apartheid era. However, the very process by which we try to ensure the continuity of psychology may be one which results in its demise.