The National Health Services Commission Report Of 1944: Lessons from the Past for the Reconstruction of Social Services in a Post-Apartheid South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159//2309-8708/1994/n18a4Abstract
The National Health Services Commission Report (NHSCR) of 1944 has recently regained popularity and is frequently cited as the first such study that compiled a comprehensive report on the need for a national health service in South Africa. It has been described as an "enlightened" (De Beer, 1984) and "visionary" (Benatar, 1990) report. While these perceptions of the Commission's report may be contested, indeed it has been criticized by Marks (1987) and Packard (1989), the report (to the best of knowledge of the author) has not been evaluated in terms of its findings and recommendations with respect to social services.
The issue that the Commission researched in the late 1930s and early 1940s is indeed relevant today - given the numerous calls for a unitary health service (e.g., Coovadia:1987); and Benatar:1990). The current literature on the transformation of South African health policy has tended to, with a few exceptions, ignore the issue of "social services" (this concept, popularized by the Organization of Appropriate Social Services of South Africa, is preferred and includes practices that are usually labelled mental health and social welfare). This paper attempts to revisit the NHSCR to evaluate its treatment of the role and location of social services in a national health service and to explore its possible lessons for current health and social service policy analysts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yogan Pillay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors' and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors’ publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: “This is an electronic version of an article published in PINS, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX–XXX”, DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/pins) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University’s’ Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The copyright of the article(s) lies with the author(s).
The copyright of the journal lies with PINS-psychology in Society.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/