"To Rule And Own, Or To Live Like Shy Deer": The Dilemmas of a Profession (1)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159//2309-8708/1992/n16a4Abstract
At its 1989 and 1990 annual conferences, the Psychological Association of South Africa (PASA), showed the clearest evidence a yet of going through a process of self-examination as a result of changing political realities in this country. At the 1990 conference, this was operationalized a need to restructure the Association to provide a home for all South African psychologists. Without negating the debates conducted al these annual meetings, I believe, however, that there is an underlying, deeper issue at stake here. For me, this is related to the process of professionalization (2).
Since the essay is not intended as a conceptual analysis of what a profession is, I shall simply use the definition given by Abbott (1988): " ... professions are exclusive occupational groups applying somewhat ab tract knowledge to particular cases" (p8). By extension, professionalization then is the process via which the occupational group establishes its exclusivity over a specific knowledge domain (see J. Louw, 1990, pl4 for a definition of the professionalization of psychology).
Professionalization can be examined at a number of levels of abstraction. For example: in terms of the role of intellectuals in society, or in terms of the division of expert labour in society. At a somewhat less abstract and more empirical level one might consider the process of professionalization as it unfolds in a particular occupation. At a fairly concrete level, one might examine practical measures a profession has at its disposal to advance its position vis-a-vis other professions, or to provide better services in society. Given the context of this essay, it treats the topic at fairly concrete levels of analysis.
The discussion opens with two theses, which are essential to clarify the contentions made subsequently. These take the form of ten practical suggestions as to how the profession might respond to its current dilemmas.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Johann Louw

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors' and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors’ publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: “This is an electronic version of an article published in PINS, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX–XXX”, DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/pins) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University’s’ Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The copyright of the article(s) lies with the author(s).
The copyright of the journal lies with PINS-psychology in Society.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/