Back to Freud: A radicalism recalled*
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159//2309-8708/1991/n15a2Abstract
I intend in this paper to review Freud's understanding of human psychology, and to remind both psychoanalysts and main-stream psychologists of its essentially radical approach. The psychological process with which Freud was concerned is more complicated than the shrivelled thing described and studied by behavioural scientists. I believe, too, that Freud's style, with its subversive vein of social and intellectual anti-authoritarianism is another facet of his radicalism. Even now, psychoanalysis is opposed because of its power to strip the pretensions from the complacent conservatism of the political right and left, both in public life and in the soi-disant social sciences.
The paper will introduce some points of divergence between main-stream behaviourist and cognitive psychologies (on the one hand) and psychoanalysis (on the other). This will lead into a discussion of Freud's basic insights into human psychology. I then examine Freud's psychobiological assumptions, and suggest that these, far from being conservative, offer an anti-racist and progressive biological understanding of human nature. The relevance of psychoanalysis to the problem of human freedom is next evaluated, and finally, I shall illustrate Freud's essential radicalism from the humanist-psychoanalytic approach of Erich Fromm.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Leonard Bloom

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors' and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors’ publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: “This is an electronic version of an article published in PINS, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX–XXX”, DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/pins) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University’s’ Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The copyright of the article(s) lies with the author(s).
The copyright of the journal lies with PINS-psychology in Society.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/