Professionalisation of African Healers: Apparent problems and constraints
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159//2309-8708/1988/n11a2Abstract
There is much talk afoot about the professionalization of African healers (or African medicine) but there is little evidence of any attempt to deconstruct the notions involved. I will examine the terminology and the assumptions embodied in a question which is commonly posed: What constraints are encountered in attempts at professionalization of African medicine? I then present three different positions from which to view African medicine, postulating that unless the different positions are acknowledged it remains impossible to address the question. Finding difficulty too with the notion of professionalization, I describe various ways in which the concept is viewed. Only after this 'deconstruction' do I attempt to directly discuss some of the problematics raised by the question. By this stage it will have become obvious to the reader that there is no single answer. Instead, there are possible answers from each of the positions 1 outline. I point to a possible view that members of the 'western' medical profession perceive African medicine as 'matter out of place' and briefly outline this perspective. I suggest that, from this position, the solution to the 'problem' is found in the idea of professionalization - i.e. in cleansing and purifying the polluted. My final thesis is that the process of professionalization is a rite of passage. This paper highlights that attempts at professionalization of African medicine involve not only a range of positions but also some hidden agendas.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amanda Kottler

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors' and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors’ publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: “This is an electronic version of an article published in PINS, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX–XXX”, DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/pins) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University’s’ Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The copyright of the article(s) lies with the author(s).
The copyright of the journal lies with PINS-psychology in Society.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/