Minimal extracorporeal circulation: An appraisal from a private practice

Marius Swart, Gina Joubert


Introduction: The systemic inflammatory response associated with cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) is detrimental to organ function in varying degrees. Minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) assumes an attenuation of these deleterious effects. The aim of this study was to compare conventional CPB (CCPB) with MECC, in a population of patients who had their CABG done in a private practice in South Africa.

Methods: Two historical cohort analytical studies were done on patients who had isolated CABG done by one surgeon in the Mediclinic Bloemfontein. Patients who had their CABG done using CCPB were compared statistically using logistic regression to those who had their CABG done with MECC. A propensity score matching was also used to compare the 2 groups. In a second follow-up study, a once-off lactate on arrival in the intensive care unit was compared. A qualitative assessment of the technique by the various role-players in theatre was added to the initial study.

Results: The primary CCPB group had 1 572 patients. The MECC group comprised 367 patients. No statistically significant outcome difference was found in terms of mortality, major morbidity, post-operative blood loss or usage of homologous blood. Once the 2 groups were evenly matched, patients with MECC had a better serum creatinine postoperatively, but renal dialysis could not be avoided. Patients with MECC also had a statistically shorter hospital stay. The second study (CCPB n=63 and MECC n=100) confirmed the shorter hospital stay. There was no difference in the lactate value between the 2 groups. In general, there are varying levels of enthusiasm among the theatre specialists for a MECC strategy.

Conclusions: MECC protects the kidneys, but not so much against renal dialysis. MECC patients could stay for a somewhat shorter time in hospital. Tissue perfusion based on a once-off lactate level was equal. MECC might be technically more demanding. This article is an important addition to the literature that adds a local perspective.


cardio-pulmonary bypass; minimal extracorporeal circulation; private

Full Text:




  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN: 2071-4602 (online) ISSN: 1996-6741 (print)

Copyright © 2017 SA Heart Journal

Hosted by Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service since 2017.

Creative Commons License -CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

This journal is hosted by the SU LIS on request of the journal owner/editor. The SU LIS takes no responsibility for the content published within this journal, and disclaim all liability arising out of the use of or inability to use the information contained herein. We assume no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any breaches of agreement with other publishers/hosts.