The promotion of equality and prevention of unfair discrimination Act 4 of 2000: How to balance religious freedom and other human rights in the higher education sphere
Abstract
The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (the Equality Act) was inter alia promulgated to create a caring South African society. To achieve this goal, the Equality Act prohibits unfair discrimination, hate speech and harassment on a number of prohibited grounds, including religion, conscience, belief and culture. The Bill of Rights in the 1996 Constitution also prohibits unfair discrimination on these and other grounds. In addition, the Bill of Rights also contains rights such as the right to freedom of association and the right to freedom of expression. All laws, including the Equality Act, must be interpreted in accordance with the spirit, purport and objectives of the Bill of Rights. This article identifies possible challenges in applying the Equality Act where the alleged perpetrator attempts to justify the discrimination based on his/her religious beliefs, freedom of expression and/or freedom of association.
References
Albertyn, C. and B. Goldblatt. 1998. Facing the Challenge of Transformation: Difficulties in the Development of an Indigenous Jurisprudence of Equality. South African Journal on Human Rights 14(2): 248-276.
Albertyn, C. and J. Kentridge. 1994. Introducing the Right to Equality in the Interim Constitution. South African Journal on Human Rights 10(2): 149-178.
Albertyn, C., B. Goldblatt and C. Roederer. 2001. eds. Introduction to the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.
Bailey, P. and A. Devereux. 1998. The Operation of Anti-Discrimination Laws in Australia. In Human Rights in Australian Law: Principles, Practice and Potential, ed. D. Kinley. Leichardt: The Federation Press. 292-318.
Bohler, N. 2000. Equality Courts: Introducing the Possibility of Listening to Different Voices in South Africa. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law 63 (2): 288-294.
Bohler-Muller, N. 2000. What the Equality Courts can Learn from Gilligan’s Ethic of Care: A Novel Approach. South African Journal on Human Rights 16(4): 623-641.
Bohler-Muller, N. and M. Tait. 2000. The Equality Courts as a Vehicle for Legal Transformation – A Few Practical Suggestions. Obiter 21: 406.
Brand, D. 2000. Die Wet op die Bevordering van Gelykheid en die Voorkoming van Onbillike Diskriminasie. Word and Action 40(371): 13-18.
Carpenter, G. 2001. Equality and Non-discrimination in the New South African Constitutional Order (1): The Early Cases. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law 64: 619-642.
Carpenter, G. 2001. Equality and Non-discrimination in the New South African Constitutional Order (2): An Important Trilogy of Decisions. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law 64: 409-422.
Carpenter, G. 2002. Equality and Non-Discrimination in the new South African Constitutional Order (3): The Saga Continues. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law 65(1): 37-58.
Carpenter, G. 2002. Equality and Non-discrimination in the New South African Constitutional Order (4): Update. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law 65(2): 177-185.
Chemerinsky, E. 1998. Can Courts Make a Difference? In Redefining Equality, ed. D. N and D. M Douglas, 191-204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Currie, I. and J. de Waal. 2005. The Bill of Rights Handbook. Cape Town: Juta.
Davis, D. 1999. Democracy & Deliberation. Kenwyn: Juta.
De Vos, P. 2000. Sexual Orientation and the Right to Equality in the South African Constitution: National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality & Another v Minister of Justice & Others. South African Law Journal 17 (1): 17-25.
De Waal, J. 2002. Equality and the Constitutional Court. SA Mercantile Law Journal 14(2): 141-156.
Dror, Y. 1958. Law and Social Change. Tulane Law Review 33(4): 787-802.
Gutto, S. B. O. 2001. Equality and Non-Discrimination in South Africa: The Political Economy of Law and Law Making. Claremont: New Africa Books.
Jagwanth, S. 2003. Affirmative Action in a Transformative Context: The South African Experience. Connecticut Law Review 36(3): 725-745.
Kende, M. S. 2000. Gender Stereotypes in South African and American Constitutional Law: The Advantages of a Pragmatic Approach to Equality and Transformation. South African Law Journal 117(4):475-770.
Klare, K. E. 1998. Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism. South African Journal on Human Rights 14(1):146-188.
Lacey, N. 1987. Legislation Against Sex Discrimination: Questions from a Feminist Perspective. Journal of Law and Society 14(4): 411-421.
Lane, P. (2006) South Africa’s Equality Courts: An Early Assessment. http://www.csvr.org.za/papers/paprctp5.htm (accessed 24 February 2006).
Liebenberg, S. and M. O’Sullivan. 2001. “Equality: Theory and Practice in South Africa and elsewhere”. Paper presented at a conference: South Africa’s New Equality Legislation: A Tool for Advancing Women’s Socio-economic Equality. University of Cape Town. January, 18-20.
Loenen, T. 1997. The Equality Clause in the South African Constitution: Some Remarks from a Comparative Perspective. South African Journal on Human Rights 13(3): 401-429.
Loenen, T. and R. R. Rodrigues, eds. 1999. Non-discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Lustgarten, L. 1986. Racial Inequality and the Limits of the Law. The Modern Law Review 49(1): 68-85.
Lustgarten, L. 1992. Racial Inequality, Public Policy and the Law: Where Are We Going?” Discrimination: The Limits of Law, eds. B Hepple and E. M Szyszczak, 455-471. London: Mansell.
Moseneke, D. 2002. The Fourth Bram Fischer Memorial Lecture: Transformative Adjudication. South African Journal on Human Rights 18(3): 309-319.
Pieterse, M. 2005. What do We Mean When We Talk about Transformative Constitutionalism? SA Public Law 20(1):155-166.
Rautenbach, I. M. 1997. Die Verband tussen die Gelykheidsbepaling en die Algemene Beperkingsbepaling in die Handves van Regte. Journal of South African Law 114(3): 571-583.
Rautenbach, I. M. 2001. Die Konstitusionele Hof se Riglyne vir die Toepassing van die Reg op Gelykheid II. Journal of South African Law? 9(2): 329-340.
Van der Vyver, J. D. 1998. Gelykberegtiging. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law 61:367-376.
Van der Walt, A. J. and H. Botha. 1998. “Coming to Grips with the New Constitutional Order: Critical Comments on Harksen v Lane NO. SA Public Law 13(1): 17-41.
Vogt, G. S. 2001. Non-discrimination on the Grounds of Race in South Africa – with Special Reference to the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act. Journal of African Law 45(2): 196-209.
Woolman, S. 1997. Out of Order? Out of Balance? The Limitation Clause of the Final Constitution. South African Journal on Human Rights 13(1): 102-134.
Copyright (c) 2017 Anton Kok
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
