Influencing mathematics students' academic success through online intervention: A case study
Abstract
Open distance learning (ODL), by the definition, subscribes to the limited direct engagement of the students with the learning institution. The University of South Africa, Western Cape, has placed key emphasis on providing an array of electronic support platforms to assist students with their needs in quantitative literacy skills. Consequently, as a part of this additional learning support, an online environment was designed in which the students, enrolled for various mathematics modules, were able to access an array of educational resources. Findings from similar studies suggest, that the utilisation of employment of additional learning support could show a positive effect on students’ academic achievement in distance learning. Therefore, a quasi-experimental research study was conducted to investigate this supposition by comparing the assessment outcomes among various student groups subjected to the additional learning support interventions. It has been found that online intervention might affect the success rate of the students, however, not necessarily in a simple or in the anticipated way.
References
Allen, I. E., J. Seaman and R. Garret. 2007. Blending in: the extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. MA: Newburyport.
Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman. 2011. Going the distance: online education in the United States, 2011. Sloan Consortium. MA: Newburyport.
Ashby, J., W. A. Sadera and S. W. McNary. 2011. Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 10(3):128-140.
Baggaley, J. 2012. Global education: from Genghis Khan to Facebook. Routledge.
Barritt, C., D. Lewis and W. Wieseler. 1999. Cisco Systems Reusable Information Object Strategy. RIO Strategy v3.0:23-43.
Bojuwoye, O., M. Moletsane, S. Stofile, N. Moolla and F. Sylvester. 2014. Learners' experiences of learning support in selected Western Cape schools. South African Journal of Education 34(1):1-15.
Brown, M., H. Hughes, M. Keppell, N. Hard and L. Smith. 2013. In their own words: student stories of seeking learning support. Open Praxis 5 (4):345-354.
Browne, T., R. Holding, A. Howell and S. Rodway-Dyer. 2010. The challenges of OER to Academic Practice. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1(3):1-15
Browne, T. and M. Newcombe. 2009. Open educational resources: a new creative space. Proceeding ascilite Auckland 2009.1170-1179.
Butcher, N. 2015. A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver and UNESCO.
Chawla, S., N. Gupta and R. K. Singla. 2012. LOQES: model for evaluation of learning object. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 3(7):73-79.
Clow, D. 2013. MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, ed. D. Suthers, K. Verbert, E. Duval and X. Ochoa, ACM:185-189.
Cuseo, J. 2007. Defining student success: first critical first step in promoting it. E-Source for College Transitions 4(5):2-5
Declaration, Cape Town Open Education. 2007. Cape Town Open Education Declaration: Unlocking the promise of open educational resources. http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read-the-declaration (accessed 7 February 2017).
Diamond, R. M. 2011. Designing and assessing courses and curricula: a practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Dias, O., A. W. Cunningham and L. Porte. 2016. Supplemental instruction for developmental mathematics: two-year summary. MathAMATYC Educator 7(2):4–9.
Hilton J. L., D. Gaudet, P. Clark, J. Robinson and D. Wiley. 2013. The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 14(4):37–50.
Holden, J. and P. J. L. Westfall. 2010. An instructional media selection guide for distance learning – Implications for blended learning. United States Distance Learning Association (USDLA). https://www.usdla.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/AIMSGDL_2nd_Ed_styled_010311.pdf (accessed 12 February 2017).
Jaafar, R., A. Toce and B. A. Polnariev. 2016. A multidimensional approach to overcoming challenges in leading community college math tutoring success. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 40(6):534-549.
Jarvis, P. 2006. Transforming learners through open and distance learning. The Theory and Practice of Teaching: 224. Routledge.
Learning Technology Standards Committee. 2002. IEEE Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. IEEE Standard 1484:12.
Lu, F. and M. Lemonde. 2013. A comparison of online versus face-to-face teaching delivery in statistics instruction for undergraduate health science students. Advances in Health Sciences Education 18(5):963-973.
Malm, J., L. Bryngfors and L-L. Morner. 2011. Supplemental instruction: Whom does it serve?. International journal of teaching and learning in higher education 23(3):282-291.
Moore, J. L., C. Dickson-Dean and K. Galyen. 2011. e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. The Internet and Higher Education 14(2):129-135.
Oyedemi, T. D. 2012. Digital inequalities and implications for social inequalities: a study of internet penetration amongst university students in South Africa. Telematics and Informatics 29(3):302-313.
Phelps, J. M. and R. Evans. 2006. Supplemental instruction in developmental mathematics. The Community College Enterprise 12(1):21.
Polsani, P. R. 2006. Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital information 3(4):1–10.
Porcello, D. and S. Hsi. 2013. Crowdsourcing and curating online education resources. Science 341(6143):240-241.
Raghuveer, V. R. and B. K. Tripathy. 2012. An object oriented approach to improve the precision of learning object retrieval in a self learning environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 8(1):193-214.
Raward, R. 2001. Academic library website design principles: development of a checklist. Australian Academic & Research Libraries 32(2):123-136.
Ross, T. K. and P. D. Bell. 2007. No significant difference only on the surface. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 4(7):3-13.
Sapire, I. and Y. Reed. 2011. Collaborative design and use of open educational resources: a case study of a mathematics teacher education project in South Africa. Distance Education 32(2):195-211.
Sharma, A., B. Bryant and M. Murphy. 2013. Assessing face to face and online course delivery using student learning outcomes, in Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference ISSN 2167:1435.
Smith, N. V. 2013. Face-to-face vs. blended learning: effects on secondary students ‘perceptions and performance'. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 89:79-83.
Subotzky, G. and P. Prinsloo. 2011. Turning the tide: a socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education 32(2):177-193.
Tolley, H. and H. MacKenzie. 2015. Senior management perspectives on mathematics and statistics support in higher education. Sigma, Loughborough University. http://www. sigma-network. ac. uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/sectorneeds-analysis-report. pdf. (accessed May 2015)
Tyma, P. 1998. Why are we using Java again? Communications of the ACM41(6):38-42.
Wiley, D., T. J. Bliss and M. McEwen. 2014. Open educational resources: a review of the literature, in Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, ed. M.Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen and M. J. Bishop, 781-789. Springer New York
Copyright (c) 2017 Jaroslaw Pawel Adamiak, Rael Dylan Sauls
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal is an open access journal, and the authors and journal should be properly acknowledged, when works are cited.
Authors, copyright holders, may use the publishers version for teaching purposes, in books, theses, dissertations, conferences and conference papers.
A copy of the authors' publishers version may also be hosted on the following websites:
- Non-commercial personal homepage or blog.
- Institutional webpage.
- Authors Institutional Repository.
The following notice should accompany such a posting on the website: This is an electronic version of an article published in SAJHE, Volume XXX, number XXX, pages XXX “XXX", DOI. Authors should also supply a hyperlink to the original paper or indicate where the original paper (http://www.journals.ac.za/index.php/SAJHE) may be found.
Authors publishers version, affiliated with the Stellenbosch University will be automatically deposited in the University Institutional Repository SUNScholar.
Articles as a whole, may not be re-published with another journal.
The following license applies:
Attribution CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
